Enviro-Nutters Saving the Earth by Hating Humanity
| 11 October 2009
As the greatest hoax of the modern era, “global warming”, bites the dust around the world, it behooves us all to contemplate why environmentalists—Greens—would attempt to hoodwink the world’s population into believing they could do anything to “control” the planet’s climate.
One singular fact stands out in all Green propaganda and permeates all the legislation and other programs they sponsor. It is a contempt and disdain for the Earth’s human population. The leaders of the movement hate humanity. Obsessed with population growth, anything that can reduce it—disease, poverty, famine, or lack of energy is pursued as part of the Green agenda.
The Green movement grew out of an earlier, more salutary one, conservation. We can surely thank Americans such as John Muir and others who sought to preserve tracts of wilderness such as Yellowstone and the nation’s forested areas from the rampant depredations of the 1800s and early 1900s. The nation owes a debt of gratitude to President Theodore Roosevelt for the initial creation of national parks and forests.
As the nation industrialized, rivers suffered pollution and the air was polluted by factories that befouled both. In 1970 President Richard M. Nixon signed into being the Environmental Protection Agency which, empowered by the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, can be credited to early success.
However, like all government agencies, the EPA has steadily sought to expand its powers and, aided by other environmentally related agencies such as the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Corps of Engineers, it has relentless pursued ever larger control over all the land and waters of the nation, and by extension over everyone’s life.
They pose a threat to the constitutionally protected right to private property, vital to the nation’s economy and a keystone of capitalism.
The growth of literally hundreds of “environmental” organizations has led to an endless barrage of scare campaigns, often without any basis in science, and used to undermine the industrial, agricultural, and transportation sectors of the nation’s economy.
On a global scale, the United Nations Environmental Program and its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have pursued an agenda devoid of scientific merit or justification.
Greens lie and they lie all the time
The lies about Alar came close to wrecking apple growers. The lies about the spotted owl species laid waste to the northwest’s timber industry. New claims about alleged dangers from plastic bottles are based on lies.
The lie that carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, has anything to do with “warming” has driven the totally deceitful “global warming” hoax and is used to create a market for worthless “carbon credits” that ultimately increase the cost of energy and everything else.
The introduction of the Endangered Species Act is one long history of near constant failure in pursuit of a foolish goal, advocating for obscure species while thwarting all manner of projects useful to the human species. It has been used to impoverish farmers in Oregon and California.
The truth is that the Earth is actually cooling, not warming. Carbon Dioxide is not a “pollutant.” The North and South Poles are not melting. Sea levels worldwide are not rising any more than they have for millennia. Polar bears are thriving. Solar and wind energy is a bust, providing barely 1% of all electricity used daily nationwide.
The truth is that pesticides protect people against insect and rodent-borne diseases and property damage. Saving “endangered species” ignores the fact that 95% of all the species that previously existed are now extinct.
The truth is that nothing humans do has any affect on the climate that is dependent on solar and ocean cycles.
The Greens are now famous for their campaigns against products from toilet paper to plastic bags, bottles, and everything else made from plastic, a petroleum derivative. Anyone who buys “environmentally” approved products is being charged a premium for their own gullibility. Every supermarket and store in America has comparable, safe products at far lower costs.
Americans are constantly harangued to adopt Green lifestyles. Generations of young Americans have suffered the child abuse of being told that the Earth is doomed despite its 4.5 billion year existence.
Corporations that advertise and promote their “Green” credentials pander to environmental hoaxes in order to avoid criticism and generate an “environmentally friendly” public image.
The real environmental message speaks to a hatred of humanity and the many technological, medical, agricultural, and other achievements that have enhanced, improved, and saved the lives of millions.
If you hate energy, join an environmental organization.
If you hate science, join an environmental organization.
If you hate jobs in America, join an environmental organization.
If you hate industrial and agricultural development and progress, join an environmental organization.
And if you hate humanity, join an environmental organization.
Comments
Another point of reference are the extent of the forests. One can safely assume that before the USA got to start building more than a million homes a year there were still lots of forests. And before the global trade in timber started, all other countries have their forests intact except for the developed countries in Europe who started cutting down their forests to build the naval fleets during the colonial period that started in the 16th century.
Spain and Portugal for example started cutting trees in their colonies to help build the colonial naval fleets since 500 years ago.
Now what is the effect of having removed 80% of the forests from all lands worldwide? The quick answer would be that we have lost a considerable mass of the biosphere that was supposed to absorb the carbon dioxide. But lack of carbon dioxide absorption is the least of our worry here. The worry that relates to the loss of the forests is the release of more water vapor into the atmosphere which should have otherwise stayed in watersheds and aquifers if the forests have remained intact. The increase in water vapor in the atmosphere is the main culprit of warming. And yet this is not talked about. Why are there no discussions on the growing levels of atmospheric moisture?
That moisture in the atmosphere have increased is visibly evidenced by the amount of water that are dumped by the hurricanes and typhoons. There were indeed flooding before. But the extent of flooding that can be seen in India, Philippines, Bangladesh, along the Mississippi River Basin, in Germany and England over the last five years confirm that indeed the moisture in the atmosphere are already higher than past levels.
Too much moisture in the atmosphere means that the atmosphere retains a lot of heat that is received from the sun. This means also that the heat that would normally be released to the outer space when you have clear skies specially during the night, that heat is now retained in part to the extent of the moisture that is present in the atmosphere. And since water vapor is lighter than air, the moisture will begin to move up to the higher layers of the atmosphere and continue to receive and trap more heat from the sun.
If we discussed the issue of global warming in this context then the debates will start to make sense.
RSS feed for comments to this post.