Please help offset our server/hosting costs. With your donation you can help us keep this site going. Any amount is appreciated!

Get a Daily Digest via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Latest Comments

  • Looks like a great book, but the author's name, Goreham, is a bit unfortuna... More...
  • The IPCC completely failed the first point in the Baloney Detection Kit! Na... More...
  • Was the recent Nobel Peace prize based on "crap" or on peer reviewed materi... More...
  • maher is so stupid it takes him a week to decide which hand to surprise his... More...
  • Well Werner my boy, I just have to tell you that you don't know crap from c... More...
  • Now that we have established what you consider "credible, verifiable, factu... More...
  • The science does not support the hysteria about man-made global warming. I ... More...
christianoccasionAd2
advert

Who's Online Now

We have 2035 guests online
sec-logo

Based upon information supplied to it by the Space and Science Research Center (SSRC), the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun a review of the Obama administration’s carbon trading, ‘emission allowance,’ and climate change permitting programs to insure investors are adequately protected.

According to SSRC Director, John Casey, “The reason for our request to the SEC is straightforward. Since global warming has ended, there simply is no need to implement a massive government tax or investment/trading programs in a vain attempt to control it. The natural repeating cycles of the Sun which caused the past global warming have now reversed to a normal though potentially dangerous cold phase.

The unbelievable $646 billion tax on the people paid for through cap and trade programs and spelled out in the proposed 2010 federal budget is the largest environmental tax in the history of the United States. It is also completely unnecessary. Here we are creating a huge tax and investment system to counteract something that does not exist and yet not spending the first dollar to get our country prepared for the rapidly advancing coldest weather in over 200 years!

As a result, the SSRC in conjunction with its parent company, have asked the SEC to insure that publicly traded companies and their investors are protected from the real prospect of what I believe could be highly risky if not illegal (“worthless securities”) trading in climate change control instruments. In a March 19, 2009, letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, I have asked that she take several definitive steps to protect investors. The least of these steps is that the SEC needs to insure investors are provided full and accurate disclosure of climate change investment risks. Investors should be told that there is no global warming and that the coming cold weather may make any such investment vehicles worthless in a few years as the world comes to recognize man made climate change for the failed concept that many experts believe it is. I can see investors, Wall Street firms, and public companies losing tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars because of these climate change control efforts by the Obama administration.”

On whether a political appointee such as Chairman Schapiro will do anything to interrupt the climate change and global warming programs of the Obama administration, Casey voiced optimism saying, “Chairman Schapiro has been given a free hand and wide ranging mandate to revamp the SEC and toughen its investor protections in light of a wave of scandals and other financial crises that have rocked Wall Street over the past two years. I am hopeful that she will stand up to partisan politics by making all such climate change controlling investment programs contain full disclosure of the risks involved. I would like her to go beyond that as specified in my letter by for example, halting all carbon trading. I have not announced the SEC’s review previously to allow them sufficient time to look into the matter. Now that the SEC has had the ball in their court for the past three months, I hope we will see a ruling soon, especially with climate legislation now being considered by Congress.”

In looking at the climate change question objectively Casey injected, “The SSRC is the leading independent science research organization in the United States on the science of and planning for the next cold climate era. I was the recipient of heavy and often irrational criticism from all sectors when I first announced my research and the forecast of the next climate change to the media, US government, and the scientific community. Now that my predictions have come to pass, scientists and prominent leaders from around the world have now joined the fray in the effort to spread the word about the dramatic changes taking place in the Sun and what really causes climate change on Earth.

Accordingly, the SSRC is now the most quoted source on the world wide web on the subject of the climate change to this new cold era. I will continue my efforts to alert the media, our government, and the American people on how this next climate period will unfold and what effects it will have on everyone. This request to the SEC for investor protection and disclosure of the inherent risks of carbon trading is another logical step in support of that mission. The on going process of the SSRC to speak the truth about climate change will also accelerate as the cold weather gets closer.

This Wednesday for example, the SSRC will issue a new climate forecast, the most important of its kind in over two years. It will provide a more detailed schedule for how soon the deepest cold will arrive and start to create food shortages in the United States because of expected crop damage. In the meantime, let’s hope the SEC does the right thing by protecting investors from the folly that is called ‘man made climate change.’ ”

Letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro

Source

Comments  

 
# 2009-06-17 06:01
John, keep up the good work. This is a HUGE and un-needed boondoggle-a massive tax on energy produceres as well as on individuals.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2009-06-24 05:41
Does the SSRC have its findings published in any scientific peer reviewed journals? As far as I can tell from googling around, the SSRC has no standing in the field of climatology or even in the scientific community in general. According to the About Us page at the SSRC website, the director of the SSRC, John L. Casey, has BS degree in Physics and Mathematics. The SSRC website does not reveal where Mr. Casey got those degrees from. So, why should anyone take Mr. Casey's opinion on climate change seriously?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2009-06-24 15:18
I just searched SEC.gov for any mention of SSRC or John Casey. Nothing.

Is this SSRC article a joke or just plain propaganda?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2009-07-06 17:28
SSRC is a P.O. box. It is a conservative scam.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Keep it clean and on topic. Long links are truncated after posting and will still work.


Security code
Refresh